On Tue, 10.07.12 08:27, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" ([email protected]) wrote:
> > On 07/09/2012 11:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >BTW, as a follow-up to this. In this Fedora feature page you find what > >I'd propose to use as .service file for the various display managers: > > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework > > Is not that proposed unit on that feature page missing mentioning > that it should conflict with other display manager services as in > the conflict section should look more like this > "[email protected] gdm.service kdm.service lxdm.service > xdm.service"? Hmm, that would require that we listed in all display manager implemenation's units all othe rpossible implementations. Which is kinda suboptimal. I think it is nicer here to rely on the display-manager.service symlink: since it can only point to one implementation we effectively make sure that only one instance can be enabled at the same time. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
