On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/6/19 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: >> On Tue, 19.06.12 18:50, Michael Olbrich ([email protected]) wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:03:23AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> > On Mon, 18.06.12 21:56, Paul Menzel ([email protected]) >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Do you know of a service file for openssh-server? >>> > >>> > The Fedora packages have some, but I don't like them too much since they >>> > don't use socket activation... >>> >>> Is someone actually working on real socket activation for openssh? While >>> the inetd like stuff works, it does not perform well. >> >> it doesn't? In which way? It should be totally OK? > > IMHO there is one "issue" with the inetd-style approach: it is > explicitly discouraged in "man sshd". It may well be the case of > outdated documentation, as I don't see any of the indicated problems > on my desktop or laptop. Still, it would be nice to clarify this > discrepancy in the unit file.
The documentation is incomplete. The ephemeral key is only generated if SSHv1 is enabled, while practically every installation now has "Protocol 2" set. -- Mantas Mikulėnas _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
