Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, 31.05.12 12:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: >> On 05/31/2012 12:40 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> > I'd be open to rename "systemctl man" to "systemctl doc" too, if people >> > want this, if we make it cover both man and info. Not sure I like "doc" >> > too much though. Maybe we can find another name? Suggestions? The reason >> > I picked "man" in the first place is that it is kinda an obvious choice >> > and man is much more ubiquititous than info. >> 'help' seems to be used -- e.g. 'git help rebase'. > > We already have "systemctl help", which is equivalent to "systemctl > --help". > > I wonder though whether it would make sense to make "systemctl help" > with params work as before but with params take over the role of > "systemctl man"? Would that be confusing?
I don't think it would be. It would actually match my expectations (spoiled by git, I am). -- |8] _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
