On Thu, 17.05.12 16:00, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Or do you think it's not even worth it (medium > >> term goal is probably to disable support for non-native units at compile > >> time anyway I guess...) > > > > I think we will keep that for a long time. We plan though, to rip out > > all sysv code and provide the functionality with generators running at > > bootup. This would read all the sysv init scripts and create .service > > files in /run for them. > > Ahh yes, I can see that being a cleaner system right enough. It would > still be nice to know that a given unit is actually sysv, lsb or native > tho' (and actually generating files in /run would kind of blur the "is > native" question a bit) for the purposes of this prioritisation, but I > guess just knowing if the unit was from lib, run or etc might be enough > in this case.
I have now added an item to the todo list so that we priorize what to drop by its location in /run vs. /usr and so on. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
