On Thu, 16.02.12 22:53, mokasin ([email protected]) wrote:

> > failure exit codes)
> >
> > Lennart
> >
> 
> It seems also to ignore an exit code due to an error.
> 
> If the service failed to start for an actual reason, wouldn't systemd
> fail to recognize it?

Yes, we prefixing with "-" ensures that all unclean exit results of a
process are considered OK, which precise signal codes and retvals those
are you cannot specify.

I don't think it makes too much sense to make this
configurable. 

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to