On Wed, 11.01.12 14:44, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Forcing the use of @ introduces a policy, which should preferably not be > >> done. Since programs started from the initrd obviously should be having > >> a /proc/*/{cwd,exe} symlinks pointing to the initramfs vfsmount. > > > >They are in a different namespace, so that wouldn't work. > > Namespace as in clone(2)'s CLONE_NEWNS?
No, my expression was a bit unclean there. What I meant is that the path in argv[0] and similar stops making sense after the switch to the root fs, since we did a MS_MOVE there, which invalidates all old paths... But yeah, there's no new vfs namespace opened, just some major changes in what means what in the original namespace. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
