On Mon, 24.10.11 18:04, Michael Olbrich ([email protected]) wrote: > This patch introduces a small watchdog daemon that supervises systemd > and handles /dev/watchdog. This is mostly a prove of concept for now.
Hmm, do we really want to do this externally? Maybe it would be nicer to do this right from PID 1? I mean, it's just two ioctl()s right? i.e. a tight loop that each time we get a TIMEOUT=1 notification message just calls WDIOC_KEEPALIVE and WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT should be sufficient, right? This sounds like something we could do in 10 lines in PID 1, which otherwise would cost 200 lines outside of it. This would also allow us to get rid of the extra properties on the Manager object, right? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
