Am 12.10.2011 15:57, schrieb Frank Lahm: > 2011/10/12 Reindl Harald <[email protected]>: >> Am 12.10.2011 15:35, schrieb HAT: >> From: Reindl Harald <[email protected]>, 05 Oct 2011 12:32:00 +0200 >> >>>>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-afpd.service >>>>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-cnid.service >>>>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-atalk.service >> >>> there are a lot of manuals but the most relevant in my opinion are >>> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.unit.html >>> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.service.html >>> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.exec.html >> Hmmm. It may be possible. >> If you send more suitable afpd.service and cnid_metad.service to me, >> I will try to write atalkd.service, papd.service and so on. >> >> >> Hi >> >> My problem is that i did not get "cnid_metad" started as a own >> service, i tried Type=simple and Type=forked, it will be started >> and somehow the process closed without any error >> >> seems like a bug in netatalk > > Guess not. According to > <http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.service.html> it's > Type=forking, not Type=forked. > Of course cnid_metad daemonizes. Also I'd utilize PIDFile=...
was a typo in my last mail i used the "type=" in my tests from copy&paste of working services no idea why "cnid_metad" did not want to start via systemd i will try this again next weekend and let you know my results do you have any F15 machine / VM to analyze what happens if i do not get it running?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
