On 10/12/2011 03:46 PM, Barry Scott wrote:
Thanks to Michal's observation that swapoff failed we have now found the
root cause.
swapoff is called while all our production processes are still running.
We would have expected systemd to turn off swap after stopping most if not
all processes and thus freeing up as much memory as possible. swapoff fails
becuase there is not enough ram available to load the pages from swap into.
Is this a systemd problem or an issue with the way we wrote our services
and targets?
Do you use "DefaultDependencies=false" in any of your service unit
files? That could explain the missing ordering.
Michal
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
