On Wed, 24.08.11 23:54, Marius Tolzmann ([email protected]) wrote: > > On 24.08.2011 21:21, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >On Wed, 24.08.11 21:12, Marius Tolzmann ([email protected]) wrote: > > > >> > >>On 24.08.2011 18:52, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >>>Hmm, yeah, if ExecStartPre= we put the unit in failure mode. > >>> > >>>So, let me see if I got this right: you are looking for something like > >>>ExecStartPre= but twhere the program when it returns non-zero should > >>>just cause the service to be skipped but not be put in failure state? > >> > >>Yes. that's my request. > > > >I have now added this to the TODO list. It won't be easy to add this > >though, as execution extrernal processes synchronously is not an > >option. More likely I'll add an additional prefix char to ExecStart= > >(like "-") which would indicate skip-on-fail or so. > > I think you mean ExecStartPre= here!?
Indeed. Sorry for the confusion. > And thanks for considering implementing this feature sometime.. 8) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
