Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) said: > Heya, > > here's a little document Kay and I put together outlining our rough > plans for systemd for the next Fedora cycle: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_ev4f0gwBuvs6SH_N8fN5LO4LV3sbwtJsLq52F_wwpU/edit?hl=en&authkey=CObM_7UI > > It mostly focusses on cleaning up seat and login management for users, > i.e. the first big steps in bringing systemd to user sessions. On the > way want to fix multi-seat support properly and running services outside > of a session, and we will get rid of CK. > > The good news for embeded folks: all of this will be implemented in a > tiny new dbus service "systemd-logind", which can easily be removed for > minimal setups, when tracking unprivileged user logins is unnecessary. > > Anway, we post this here as RFC, and to give you folks an idea what > we'll do next.
... There will be no public CK database. However we will provide a tiny library (drop-in or .so) which allows NM, PK and D-Bus query whether a PID or user is currently on an active sesssion without involving D-Bus, as fast path for auth checks ... It would be nice if the ck-for-admins binaries still have an analog (ck-list-sessions, etc.). ... udev-acl will move into this dbus service ... I would hope that the interface for the udev rules themselves is not going to change, merely the mechanism that's used to apply the ACLs? ... CK's shutdown/reboot handling moves into a tiny bus service ... ... Would the shutdown/reboot/halt binaries remain separate from this servce? Bill _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
