On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:38:35 +0200 Kay Sievers wrote: > Wouldn't it be nicer to have ConditionSecurity=SELinux, like we have > ConditionVirtualization=kvm? You never know what people invent next > year. :)
OK, why not. I guess just having ConditionSecurity=SELinux and ConditionSecurity=!SELinux would be enough for my current needs. So I won't bother distinguishing between enforcing and permissive. It can be extended later to parse ConditionSecurity=SELinux:enforcing and similar if anyone needs that. > > ConditionPathExists=!/.autorelabel > > This flag file is supposed to be found at the next bootup, right? Correct. Michal _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
