On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 00:11, Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 2011-03-28 23:55, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>On Mon, 28.03.11 23:46, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote: >>> On Monday 2011-03-28 23:04, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> >On Fri, 25.03.11 05:07, Kay Sievers ([email protected]) wrote: >>> > >>> >> Instead of the /dev/.run trick we have currently implemented, we decided >>> >> to move the early-boot runtime dir to /run. >>> > >>> >Applied (and fixed a few minor issues). >>> >>> Uhm, *cough*. There are a handful of dot-dirs in /dev, such as >>> .sysconfig (seems to be my distro), .systemd, and .udev. Now util-linux >>> 2.19 has also started using a directory in /dev, namely .mount. >>> And now /run gets a non-standard exception? >> >>It's the other way round. >> >>We want to get rid of the hidden-files-in-/dev mess. Hence all those >>dirs will move to /run/ and /var/run will simply point to that. > > Ok that makes sense. But will /run stick around after initramfs is > done mounting & pivoting around?
Yeah, it is supposed to mount a tmpfs there and then move it to the real root. > If so, what does LSB say to this new directory? Nothing really, they just document current common practice. We might request an update to LSB after it is used for a while and has shown that it is what we want. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
