On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 03:44:46PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 17.03.11 16:50, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Lennart Poettering > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 10.03.11 00:42, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote: > > >> It is not. Suggested patch attached. > > > > > >> From: Andrey Borzenkov <[email protected]> > > >> Subject: [PATCH] mount: do not add dependency on network filesystem to > > >> quotacheck > > >> > > >> This creates loop: > > >> > > >> fs -> quotacheck -> basic -> network -> fs > > >> > > >> It does not look like quota was enabled for them in /etc/init.d/netfs > > >> anyway. If quota is required, it probably should be implemented as > > >> per mount point unit. > > > > > [...] > > > Anywaym uf you rework this patch to check for the usrquota/grpquota > > > options I'd merge it promptly > > > > But it does not solve the problem of usrquota being set on a _netfs > > filesystem. So either this has to be skipped completely or additional > > unit provided. > > Well, isn't it kind of a misconfiguration if people use > "usrquota,grpquota" on a network filesystem? But I guess an explicit > check for _netdev and fstype_is_network(p->fstype) can't hurt.
As for "_netdev", it is quite possible for quota-supporting filesystem (like ext*) to be mounted from network device (iSCSI, AoE or other). "_netfs" seem not to be documented in mount manpage. -- Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men: xmpp: [email protected] one blends softly casual into the other. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
