On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> wrote: > B1;2790;0cOn Fri, 11.03.11 15:26, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) > wrote: > >> Support displaying of Sockets for a service. Renames >> bus_unit_append_dependencies into bus_properties_append_units >> as this is what it really does. > > Looks good, too, but I think bus_unit_append_dependencies() is a better > name, since bus_property_append_xxxx() is really just for the most > basic types. >
What about bus_unit_append_units then? I really wanted to avoid it :) It is no more just dependencies, so I'd really prefer to rename it. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
