On Fri, 11.03.11 09:51, Rainer Gerhards ([email protected]) wrote:

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Biebl [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 8:45 AM
> > To: Rainer Gerhards
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-logger and external syslog daemon
> > 
> > 2011/3/11 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > So isn't that already a solution?
> > >
> > 
> > The problem with PRINTK_TIME afaics is that it needs to be turned on
> > explicitly whereas I'd expect SO_TIMESTAMP will be available always
> > (if the kernel is recent enough)?
> > 
> > In any case you'd need to interpret that data on the rsyslog side, to
> > compute a correct time stamp and then (optionally) strip off the [
> > 5913.491848] markers.
> 
> I am not opposed to doing that -- I'd really like to have as good a timestamp
> as possible. But the issue is that usually there is none. I've also seen that
> the SO_TIMESTAMP fix is not present in currently frequently distributed
> kernels
> 
> So question now: how to proceed?

SO_TIMESTAMP will be in F15.

The kmsg printk timestamps have been available for much longer and could
be parsed by rsyslog right-away.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to