>> Would it work better if /usr was an automounted target? > > That would probably blow up in your face, since a lot of programs used > during early boot end up accessing /usr and would stay stuck
Aren't /usr/bin and /usr/sbin and /usr/lib supposed to house **only** binaries and respective libraries that are **not** required for boot-up? If so, then the right solution would be to move those required binaries to /bin, /sbin. Not supporting a separate /usr would be a major setback for systemd, IMO. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
