On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:41:11PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > really no good reason to split it off anyway. Folks who want to do ro > /usr are aiming too low, they should go for ro /.
As I noted on the fedora-devel list, that's actually a functional reason for wanting a separate /usr: It'd be nice to support a separate /usr in this case as well, because changes to /etc are usually a different use-case than changes to /usr -- the former is administrator configuration actions, and the latter almost exclusively package updates, installations, or removals. (Installing packages may or may not also entail changes to /etc, of course.) -- Matthew Miller [email protected] <http://mattdm.org/> _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
