On Nov 20, 2017, at 6:12 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <[email protected]> wrote: >> Separating method calls from property accesses solves the problem >> >> Brent wrote: >>> If we had separate subscripts for methods and properties, then the property >>> subscript could immediately call the appropriate getters and setters, while >>> the method subscript could return a ready-to-call `Method` object. >> >> >> Better yet, why bother with the ready-to-call Method-like object? Just call >> it! A Ruby binding with separate property and method handling would then >> look like this: >> >> extension RubyObj: DynamicMemberLookupProtocol { >> func callDynamicMethod(dynamicMethod method: String, args: >> [RubyObject]) -> RubyObj { >> get { >> return RubyObject_send(rubyObject, method: member, args: args) >> } >> } >> >> subscript(dynamicMember member: String) -> RubyObj { >> get { >> return RubyObject_send(rubyObject, method: member, args: []) >> } >> set { >> RubyObject_send(rubyObject, method: "\(member)=", args: [newValue]) >> } >> } >> } >> >> When Swift sees myObj.name, it uses the getter subscript. When Swift sees >> myObj.name(), it uses the method invocation. Both work in Swift just as they >> do in Ruby — and more importantly, Ruby APIs wouldn’t feel so very awkward >> when used from Swift. > > Right, that should work directly! >
I just sent out draft 2 of the DynamicCallable proposal, which directly includes support for this. Thanks for the discussion and insight! -Chris
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
