That makes sense. I thought there may be a parsing trick involved with the way property accessors are designed.
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 9:00 PM, Slava Pestov <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is not possible in general, since we want the parser to be able to parse > code without having knowledge of declarations and their types (which might > come from other modules). Overloaded declarations complicate this further. > > I agree that the existing property syntax already has this issue, which is > unfortunate, but we should not introduce features that make the problem worse. > > Slava _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
