> On Oct 1, 2017, at 16:50, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Oct 1, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Matt Whiteside via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> That said, it’s unclear to me that superscript T is clearly an operator, >>> any more than would be superscript H (Hermitian), superscript 2, >>> superscript 3, etc. But at any rate, this would be discussion for the >>> future >> >> Allowing superscripted characters to be used as operators seems like it >> would take the proposal down a rabbit hole. > > Don’t worry: IIRC, that operator isn’t accepted by Swift 4, so it wouldn’t be > the topic of the first rounds of the proposal. > > I was simply trying to get across the idea of “design for utility”, and the > utility of superscript T is really about transposing matrices. That proposal > would be a follow-on after the already-accepted set of stuff is rationalized > :) > > -Chris
Ok, thanks for clarifying that. -Matt _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
