> Le 17 sept. 2017 à 18:00, Félix Cloutier via swift-evolution
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>
> I found that for Sequence, but Sequence is far from the only protocol with
> default implementations, and not all of them have maintainers willing to
> write and update documentation to the degree that Apple will.
How I do it is like this:
1. Make a dummy struct (or class) that claim conformance to a protocol:
struct Z: Collection {
}
2. Compiling, then deciphering the errors tells me that type deduction doesn't
work for associated type `Index` because there is no subscript. So I add one:
struct Z: Collection {
subscript (index: Int) -> Int {
get { return index }
}
}
3. Compiling again, I now get a suggestion (fixit) telling me to add
`startIndex` and `endIndex`. I add the suggested code:
struct Z: Collection {
var startIndex: Int
var endIndex: Int
subscript (index: Int) -> Int {
get { return index }
}
}
4. Compiling again, I get another suggestion (fixit) telling me I'm missing
`index(after:)`. I add it and write an implementation inside the braces. And
here I am:
struct Z: Collection {
func index(after i: Int) -> Int {
return i + 1
}
var startIndex: Int
var endIndex: Int
subscript (index: Int) -> Int {
get { return index }
}
}
5. And now it compiles. Hurray!
I made a collection type and did not have to read any documentation at all. The
hardest step is the first one where you have to figure out how to make
deduction work for the associated types based on the error messages.
--
Michel Fortin
https://michelf.ca <https://michelf.ca/>
--
Michel Fortin
https://michelf.ca
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
