+ 1 I personally find this frustrating, but at the same time Im curious as to what the argument against introducing this is.
- Nick On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:21 PM, David Sweeris via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:34, Rex Fenley via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I often find myself running into situations where I'll receive > "Ambiguous use of..." for overloaded functions or operators. In every case > these situations would be easily solved if I could specify "Generic != > CertainType" in the where clause of one of the overloads so I can > disambiguate the cases. Could this be added to language? > > + all the 1s, along with something like "where !(T: Foo)" > > IIRC, the topic has come up before, though I couldn't (quickly) find it > and don't recall what the response was (other than some variation of "no", > since we don't have it). > > - Dave Sweeris > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
