Sounds distressingly anti-modular! Really, these kinds of hypotheticals can be addressed when the need arises. For now it's a hypothetical fear about a hypothetical issue that isn't expressible and highly discouraged by this system - why produce an inverted dependency when you could simply rebalance the module by moving the declaration into a more appropriate scope? I can assure you, the proposal seeks compatibility with the existing access control modifiers, not to have to contort them to fit its own goals.
~Robert Widmann 2017/02/21 2:07、Jonathan Hull <[email protected]> のメッセージ: > >> On Feb 20, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Robert Widmann
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
