> On Feb 20, 2017, at 12:31 AM, David Hart via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 20 Feb 2017, at 00:52, Tony Arnold via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On 20 Feb 2017, at 06:25, Jose Cheyo Jimenez via swift-evolution >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We need more examples to make this case. >> >> How do we provide those examples? This thread has been actively discussed >> for close to a week now, so it would be good to do something concrete about >> it. I think Chris’ second suggestion fits my idea of a reasonable “Default” >> level of privacy when starting out, and fits the model of progressive >> disclosure as you so excellently pointed out. >> >> Is this something that should go through a proper Proposal? Is someone doing >> this already? I’d like to help/contribute if it is. > > Chris' second suggestion was dropped by Chris himself after we discussed the > disadvantages it adds. I am already working on a proposal to revert to Swift > 2's private and it should be ready soon.
Since you’re already drafting a proposal I will not draft the one I was thinking of. > >> thanks, >> >> >> Tony >> >> >> >> ---------- >> Tony Arnold >> +61 411 268 532 >> http://thecocoabots.com/ >> >> ABN: 14831833541 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
