Interesting, I think I misread it too. The one I was thinking of is the same as the rejected proposal: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0024-optional-value-setter.md
Jacob On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Joe Groff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jan 25, 2017, at 9:47 AM, Jacob Bandes-Storch <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Really? My observation from a quick test is that "a? = b" assigns b to a > if a already has a value, or does nothing if it's nil. This is sort of the > opposite of what's being proposed, which is that "a ?= b" should assign to > a only if it does NOT have a value. > > > My mistake, I misread the proposal. What Nichi appears to be suggesting is > an assignment that only happens when `b` has a value. I would hesitate to > spell that `?=` since that's so similar to '? =', but perhaps it's useful, > though there are many ways to spell that already. > > -Joe > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
