The proposal, as it stands, does nothing to indicate how this is much different from internal - all examples given would trivially be solved by internal members. I don’t think we need finer-grained access control to address this, I think we need extensions, at least in the same file as their parent declarations, to be able to define variables.
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Gonçalo Alvarez Peixoto via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, everyone! > > I would like to introduce a new proposal to swift evolution, but first I > would love to run it by all of you so I get everyone's feedback and enrich it. > > This proposal consists of introducing a new typeprivate access control level > which allows for members to be accessed in all extensions of a given type, > whether lying within or in another file. > > You'll find the proposal draft in: > https://github.com/goncaloalvarez/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-introduce-typeprivate-access-control-level.md > > <https://github.com/goncaloalvarez/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-introduce-typeprivate-access-control-level.md> > > Thanks in advance for taking the time to evaluate the proposal. > > Best regards, > Gonçalo > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
