> On Jun 30, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Dave Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote: >> I mentioned this in a comment on the gist already, but I'm really not >> digging the "array" in `arraySpacing`. We've already moved from top-level >> "stride" to "memory layout spacing," gaining plenty of clarity. I'm >> skeptical that the "array" adds anything more. Moreover, it muddies the >> waters by mentioning a specific type (Array) in a context where you're >> querying the memory layout properties of another type. > > OK, I agree with that. If we have “alignment” rather than > “defaultAlignment,” I suppose we can have plain “spacing.”
No way to last-second sell you on interval rather than spacing? // Returns the least possible interval between distinct instances of /// `T` in memory. The result is always positive. -- E _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
