> My main piece of feedback is that the method names synchronously() and > asynchronously() don’t conform to Swift 3 naming conventions for functions > and methods:
I agree. > dispatchAsynch() > dispatchSynch() I prefer something like this. It feels more Swifty. As it is, they aren't any longer than asynchronously(), if name length is a concern.
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
