> On Dec 18, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Joe Groff via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Dec 18, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Matthew Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1. Can you provide an example showing where you would place it though? > > Good question. Three options I see: > > - Before the label and binding names, where inout appears today, and where > other argument modifiers like `@autoclosure` go: func foo(&label x: Int) > > which is the minimal change. > > - Before the binding name: func foo(label &x: Int) > > which is problematic for implicitly-labeled arguments. > > - Before the type name: func foo(label x: &Int) > > This is the most definition-follows-use-y, but would be inconsistent with > other argument modifiers.
What is your suggested term for these kinds of parameters once we retire “inout”? -Dave _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
