On Monday 21 November 2011 04:37:02 Bruce Evans wrote: > pause() grew some additional complications that I don't like. Hans > noticed that DELAY(n) overflows for large n on arm. So pause() now > avoids passing large n to DELAY(). Probably no other callers of > DELAY() do this, and no callers of pause() need large n for DELAY(). >
I'll see what I can do later this week. Right now I'm very busy. --HPS _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
