-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/27/11 10:09 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> In response to one of my commits done to the ia64 GENERIC I
>> received some feedback giving a long list of issues (style,
>> formatting, seemingly gratuitous differences, annoyances, etc.)
>> with the whole set of GENERIC config files. If anyone knows a
>> reason I should NOT act on the list to bring all the GENERIC's
>> into style compliance and whatnot let me know. If nobody screams
>> I'll do what I can to fix them up in head some time after 9.0 is
>> finished.
>
> If you're doing this in response to a private email, I very much
> object if this is done without a review. I would really hate to see
> a lot of churn on the stable branch after RC1 for no reason.
>
> FYI,
>
It is in response to private email. I would not do the commit without
getting review from at least the primary architecture maintainers and,
assuming it winds up being acceptable to the reviewers, I have no
intention of MFCing it.
- --
Ken Smith
- - From there to here, from here to | [email protected]
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodor Geisel |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6qFOYACgkQ/G14VSmup/bqcgCgmf6hcDujuGu/6ux75pIkkjly
gd0AnjzQt++xzFf5WsIKqKhhKIeKod5e
=hcFB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
