On 07/10/2011 17:42, Pan Tsu wrote:
> Doug Barton <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Author: dougb
>> Date: Sun Jul 10 23:47:03 2011
>> New Revision: 223917
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223917
>>
>> Log:
>> Make sure we load kernel modules from the same path as the running kernel
>>
>> Modified:
>> head/etc/rc.d/kld
>>
>> Modified: head/etc/rc.d/kld
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- head/etc/rc.d/kld Sun Jul 10 22:09:53 2011 (r223916)
>> +++ head/etc/rc.d/kld Sun Jul 10 23:47:03 2011 (r223917)
>> @@ -41,11 +41,24 @@ kld_start()
>> {
>> [ -n "$kld_list" ] || return
>>
>> - local _kld
>> + local _kernel_path _module_path _kld _path
>> +
>> + _kernel_path=`$SYSCTL_N kern.bootfile`
>> + _kernel_path="${_kernel_path%/*}"
>> +
>> + _module_path=`$SYSCTL_N kern.module_path`
>> + _module_path="${_module_path#*\;}"
>> + _module_path="$_kernel_path `ltr $_module_path \; ' '`"
> [...]
>
> Doesn't /boot/support.4th already populates kern.module_path with
> the path of successfully booted kernel? How is this different?
When you test it, what happens?
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
