On May 5, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 05/05/11 16:18, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> On May 5, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> >>> @@ -84,15 +63,13 @@ if [ $bootable = yes ]; then >>> mv $MNT/boot/loader.efi $MNT/efi/boot/bootia64.efi >>> umount $MNT >>> mdconfig -d -u $md >>> - BOOTOPTS="-b $EFIPART -no-emul-boot" >>> + BOOTOPTS="-b bootimage=i386;$EFIPART -o no-emul-boot" >>> else >>> BOOTOPTS="" >>> fi >> Thanks! >> >> Can you explain what this particular change does or why it's done? >> > > I'm cleaning up the release-building code, and am switching them from mkisofs > to makefs, which provides the same functionality. This started with some > irritation with the cdrtools port and a bug in the HFS hybrid generation that > was breaking PPC release CD generation. Switching these to depend on makefs > in general speeds the release-building process and removes the number of > dependencies involved, since makefs is built as part of base.
Actually, I was just interested in the 'bootimage=i386' part of your change. I totally get why you're doing it :-) Sorry for not being clear... -- Marcel Moolenaar [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
