I found the problem. A new AppImage (same name, sorry) has been uploaded which includes the latest libdivecomputer again.
Thanks for catching this oversight on my part. /D > On Jun 18, 2022, at 2:19 PM, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Almost certainly a bug in my build script. > I thought that it forces a rebuild of libdivecomputer, but that may be broken. > > I'm away from my computer but will check it later today. Thanks for pointing > this out! > > /D > > On June 18, 2022 11:55:55 AM PDT, Michael Andreen via subsurface > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Decided to try the latest daily AppImage instead of my own build just to > check that everything was working even outside my build environment. However, > I quickly noticed that some fixes that I expected weren't available and it > looks like the daily AppImage is built with the libdivecomputer version that > was tagged for 5.0.8 (and 5.0.7) instead of the latest one that the submodule > points to. > > $ ./Subsurface-5.0.8-59-g21de82144a39-x86_64.AppImage --version > Subsurface v5.0.8-59-g21de82144a39, > built with libdivecomputer v0.8.0-devel-Subsurface-NG > (39dbb275ccd926a0b38e37e47b52ae59cca7cbc8) > built with Qt Version 5.12.10, runtime from Qt Version 5.12.10 > > Is this intentional? Is it just the AppImage? I haven't checked any of the > other builds. > > /Michael > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface > <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface> > -- > from my phone > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
