I did try to download and check. I didn’t see anything different (tested on MacOS 10.14.6).
Martin > Op 31 jul. 2019, om 08:12 heeft Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> het volgende > geschreven: > > >> On Jul 30, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:32:21PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote: >>> Dirk, >>> >>> do you follow the discussion about how future versions of MacOS will very >>> soon require programs to be notarised by Apple to be run: >>> >>> https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=04102019a >>> >>> Maybe you are already doing that, but I guess if not we will very soon have >>> to look into this if we want to continue to distribute a Mac version. >> >> I'm not. It's on my increasingly unmaintainably long list of things to do... > > > I looked into this. It's at the same time not hard and annoyingly painful to > do :-/ > > Can someone with the latest macOS try if this shows up as notarized? > > https://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/test/Subsurface-4.9.0-35.dmg > > (note - this file is named Subsurface-4.9.0-35.dmg which is different from > the > https://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/test/Subsurface-4.9.0-35-g29f5d15a6692.dmg > I posted yesterday... this is intentional as I didn't want to break that > test binary from yesterday by mistake... the one WITH the -g29f5d15a6692 > should be NOT notarized. The one with the shorter name without the SHA should > BE notarized) > > Thanks > > /D > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
