On 11 August, 2018 - Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > On Aug 10, 2018, at 11:08 PM, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'd rather say that we don't have this pid listed in serial_ftdi.c > > You are of course correct. > > The fact that everywhere else we use the decimal value of VID/PID, but in > that file we use hex really doesn't make it easier to find what could be wrong > when you are searching for it. > > I'll fix that and build a new test binary
That's one if the stupid things with the current libftdi thingie that I would like to see removed. If we pass something more inteligent to the open function, like a device, bus/devnum, vid/pid or something, we can remove that internal list and just access whatever the caller asked us to open. That way we can remove the searching from there to. //Anton -- Anton Lundin +46702-161604 _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
