On Samstag, 9. Juni 2018 13:53:31 CEST Berthold Stoeger wrote: > And certainly, the user should be presented > the list of new associations, before actually applying them.
I implemented a quick-and-dirty mockup of such an interface in PR#1349. > To emulate the old behavior, *all* pictures that we ever > encountered are matched. If a log is opened, all pictures in the log are > remembered in the canonical_filename->local_filename associative array. I > wonder if it would not be more sensible to match only the pictures of the > currently opened log Indeed, while testing the above changes, it occurred to me that the current behavior is very annoying. For testing, I have dive logs with images imported from old and new image-locations. I couldn't associate the new files to the log with the old images, because the new images always gave better (perfect) hits. Solution 1: Always associate matching files, even if there are images that fit better. I.e. for every image try to find the best hit. Solution 2: Only consider images from the current log or even only of selected dives. The second solution seems more sensible to me. Berthold _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
