Hi, > On 23. May 2018, at 15:23, Berthold Stoeger <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I fear that any such change would not be backwards-compatible with the current > hashes. What we could do is for <10 MB files hash all and for >10 MB hash > filesize + metadata or some such scheme. I hope the <10 MB rule would catch > nearly all current pictures (we're currently not supporting RAW images, are > we?).
I don’t think backwards compatibility is any problem at all: At worst, with a new version of hashes we get some cache misses and have to once load the actual file. So startup is slower when first running a new version. Best Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
