> On Dec 30, 2017, at 10:25 AM, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 30 December 2017 at 19:45, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 30 December 2017 at 19:44, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 30 December 2017 at 19:08, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Lubomir, >>>> >>>> I just noticed by pure coincidence that apparently a tiny bit of work has >>>> gone into Grantlee again (after being seemingly abandoned). >>>> Is there anything there that we'd want? That would help us? >>>> >>> >>> https://github.com/steveire/grantlee/commits/master >>> >>> i see some commits from July 2017, but our build script still does a: >>> git clone https://github.com/steveire/grantlee.git >>> ... >>> git checkout v5.0.0 >>> >>> there is also a fair amount of work since 95d971700 (that's v5.0.0 >>> which is from 2014), yet apart from introducing regressions i don't >>> see how that would help us. >>> >>> keeping upstream is nice, but "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" is also >>> nice. >>> i would go with the former on this one. >>> >> >> or rather, i would go with the latter. >> > > tried building the latest Grantlee against Qt 5.9 and it seems to work > fine with Subsurface. > again, i don't think it can help us with any significant bug fixes or > new features.
That's what I was wondering. In that case, let's stick with v5.0.0 Thanks /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
