But if the download data contains information that must be interpreted/converted then it is no longer an internal implementation detail.
On 12/02/2017 12:56 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > We have a very good working relationship with Shearwater. So far their > position has been that this is an internal implementation detail that is not > documented. > > /D > >> On Dec 2, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Bill Perry >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Anton, >> >> Have you or Jeff ever directly approached Shearwater to get a working >> relationship with them to avoid having to do all this reverse engineering? >> >> About 10 years ago when I was reverse engineering the Aeris dive computers, >> I tried to build a relationship with Pelagic and even tried to get Aeris & >> Oceanic to help pressure them. >> While I had good relationships with some very high level people at Aeris and >> Oceanic and they wanted Pelagic to work with me, Pelagic never would respond >> with the needed information. >> >> That said, Shearwater seems like a totally different company. >> From the few email conversations I've had so far with Shearwater, they have >> seemed to be willing to listen & talk, but I have only been discussing >> Perdix AI GUI user interface issues >> and have not yet pushed on them for any internal technical details. >> >> Surely, the subsurface project is big enough to get their attention. >> And if the number of contacts could be limited/restricted to just a couple >> of people on this end, Shearwater could work with the project get their >> products fully supported. >> >> >> --- bill >> _______________________________________________ >> subsurface mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
