On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Joakim Bygdell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For the blue I like the slightly toned down we have in the logo, but that is > my personal preference. To be precise it is the big difference in sharpness > between the top bar and everything else that bugs me, as seen in the > screenshots in my previous mail. > > Or we go with the pink.. that was awsome.
The pink is surprisingly pleasant... I tend to agree that there is something off about the blue scheme - maybe it isn't saturated enough. The recent improvements are totally great. The floating trip name is perfect. 2 things I might suggest: - In the trip header we see (# dive(s)). For some reason, that nested paren really gets me, for some silly reason. Maybe just go with the plural always to make localization easy, or pluralize correctly based on the number? - Since I haven't been specific about naming dive sites, most of my dive sites have the same name as the trip. That makes the world map work fairly well, but it makes the dive list look very repetitive. Maybe the dive row shouldn't specify the site if the site name is the same as the trip name? I noted some discussion in the past (I think it was on this thread) about adding in the "dive type" (OC, CCR, FREE) to the dive list. I think that could be valuable, especially for those preparing for certifications on different equipment. Perhaps that could fit between the dive time and the dive number? Perhaps there could be a setting to display it or not? _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
