> On Apr 24, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Salvador Cuñat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good night Dirk. > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:24:16AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >>>> but how about >>>> having a separate page on the Subsurface website or elsewhere just running >>>> a stand alone version of smtk2ssrf? >>>> >>> This was commented in the past; looks like a simple solution but then, >>> considerations about security become essential. >> >> I think Liam's idea was to have a page that explains how to build and use >> the tool which is different from offering the tool as a web service (which >> had >> all the security concerns). >> > Not sure about Liam's thoughts, but don't misunderstand me, I agree > with the security concerns. > >> I think I would be very nice to have a page that describes how to do that. >> > We have it explained in user manual (pretty bad explained, as I've > just remembered). I'll try to address this before 4.6.4. > > BTW, I've just begun to try to cross build to windows. I still think > that the main issue is the lack of such cross build.
This is one of those things where I just don't have the time. If you can get that to work and script it, I'm happy to create such a build and make it available. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
