The more testing we get before release, the better. Even a small variation in steps one does might reveal a bug. (Especially the developers tend to do things always the same way, as they know the software too well :D)
miika On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Werner Macho <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > I also an an OSTC (Sport). If testing with this (BT) is still needed I > am more than happy to do it. > > regards > Werner > > On 07/01/17 21:13, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >>> On Jan 7, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Stefan Fuchs <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hallo Dirk, >>> >>> >>> Am 07.01.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Dirk Hohndel: >>>> >>>> OK, so that's a USB device, not BT. One of my concerns is our BT >>>> support - I'm hoping that the newer version of Qt that I switched to >>>> won't give us any regressions, but of course you never know... >>>> >>> I will be able to recruit at least one OSTC (2C?!) BT beta tester. >>> Wolf (in copy) will test the 4.6 beta 2 tomorrow and give some feedback. >> >> Danke, Rolf (und natürlich Stefan). Das ist super! >> >> /D >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> subsurface mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface >> > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
