On 10/12/2016 21:40, Anton Lundin wrote:
On 10 December, 2016 - Robert Helling wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.12.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Anton Lundin <[email protected]>:
My quick experiment showed that with 2s sample rate its just to much
noise to actually see anything. 10s sample rate isn't really there
either. I think the value needs some smoothing, like a running average
or something to make sense.
I'm too tired to hack that up right now, but if you would like to do it,
be my guest.
I continued on you experiment. I changed your code to
Then I ListPlot these values in mathematica:
I think this is quite an interesting plot (x axis is depth, y axis momentary
gf) for one of my dives. Put it also shows that this is clearly not linear, not
even the last bit, the ascent from say 20m. I would love to see this for some
of your dives. Would you mind mailing me some sample xml’s with interesting
deco profile?
The plot for a deco dive looks about the same, with more noise in the
end part.
//Anton
Anton and Robert,
Are you by any chance prepared to send me a few dives as Subsurface XML
and which I could use as test cases for calculating retrospective GFs?
Kind regards,
willem
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
