Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> Date:
7/26/16 06:53 (GMT-08:00) To: Robert Helling <[email protected]> Cc:
[email protected] Subject: Re: No-fly in Subsurface?
On Jul 26, 2016, at 6:16 AM, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
On 26.07.2016, at 14:30, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote:
I haven’t had time to read in the proceedings of the DAN workshop that was
linked before. What I saw that came most closely to a recommendation was a
report of a plan to do a study trying to bend subjects in a simulated fly after
dive scenario. Which is not much that could be put into software. Maybe one
should check the Rubicon Archive for more scientific information on the issue.
ok, I did some Rubicon search and follow up reading an the two most relevant
papers seem to be
http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/6255/SPUMS_V9N3_4.pdf?sequence=1andhttp://archive.rubicon-foundation.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/5611/DAN_FAD_2002.pdf?sequence=1(in
particular the executive summary).
Upshot seems to be: Very hard to asses given the low number of cases (boarding
a place when you already have DCS symptoms seems to be a totally different
game, though), but 12-18h limits, maybe 24h seem to be a good idea and there is
no model on the marked that is able to predict this.
This seems to match my expectations.a) made up random shitb) semi-scientific
algorithms, tuned by random numbers without any scientific basis in order to
match pre-conceived notions of "this sounds about right"
/D
Did anybody ask what happens at 8000 ft when the cabin decompressed to 40,000
ft Sure. You are breathing 100% O2 if you live long enough to put the mask
on. Will you avoid DCS on the way back down to 18,000?
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
