On Thursday, December 03, 2015 12:42:20 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Do we really want this? It seems like a switch statement and we format > them with case xxx: at the same indentation level as the switch (to save > one level of indentation). This patch shows the problem with not doing > that - a LOT of emptyness in the source file (i.e., very deep > indentation).
Yes, it's a list of actions (indicated by the [] around it, with a group in it. The indentation is currently just not consistent (also inside the actions it jumps around, resulting in weirdly placed brackets. I'll look into splitting out the action into their own file in a separate patch. -- sebas Sebastian Kügler | http://vizZzion.org | http://kde.org _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
