On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:36:11AM -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > This is a bigger patch than required (it could have just changed the > "uint32_t" into "int32_t"), but I think the code ends up being easier to > read, and it should be as efficient (although because we compile with > debugging and no optimizations, splitting things up like this ends up > making the compiler split things up too - but that's our debug thing, > not anything fundamental).
I'm obviously not one bit worried about the overhead, but I actually like this much better as it is clean and obvious. Thanks, Linus /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
