On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Davide DB <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Tomaz Canabrava <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Davide DB <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> #1 From Notes > Location field (+) I can add a new dive site: > >> > >> - Why I should create a new divesite independently from my actual dives? > > > > > > You don't. > > The subsurface app should create a dive site if you already have entered > a > > name / lat / lon in previous versions. > > if this doesn't happens it's a bug. > > If a select an existing dive and i press (+) a new divesite is created. > yes - because that's 'Add' action, if you go to menu 'Manage Dive Site' you can edit it without add. ( I agree that's not the best thing and I'll move it from there. ) > > > >> - Why a global action is perfomed from "notes" tab of a specific dives? > > > > Sorry? > > See below. > > >> > >> > >> #2 Lof Menu > "manage dive siteS" I can only manage divesite from the > >> current dive. How I manage divesites despite of selected dive? > > > > > > you currently don't. > > Ok > > > >> > >> > >> For the above two points. IMHO: > >> > >> * Manage divesiteS form the main menu should manage the whole divesite > >> set. > > > > > > I'm not sure there's a need for this: ( I'll add a remove button later, > but > > this should work : ) > > I proposed this time ago but Dirk suggested a proper dive site management > view. > > > from the notes tab you can add a new dive ( and edit, but that's on the > menu > > and I'll move it back to notes ) > > and also add a remove button. > > > > so you could do everything from the notes tab ( change dive site, create > > dive site, edit dive site and remove dive site ) > > If you don't like this idea, I'm up to sugestions. > > > > > > Why you don't like it? > > > On the above comments. > > IMHO it's really a huge contradiction/nonsense doing all these > operation from a button inside a note tab that is related to a > particular dive. > In our UI all tabs (*) contain data of the selected dive. > * except stats tab that is already a nonsense. Infact I already > proposed to remove that tab once somenone will start a proper > statistic feature. > For this reason why I should create a a new dive from another dive? > It's like in a word processor program you place the "new document" > button inside the current document you are editing. > > I'm looking at dive #451 "Barracuda Point"? > I can edit only that dive site form that dive site UI. > > I need to manage my divesites? > I switch to divesites view and I can do edit/remove/add(*) operation > on one dive or set of dives. > > Regarding the "add" button I think we don't need it or we should avoid it. > Why I should have a "template" if in my loogbook I have no actual dives on > it? > It's a good way to create file inconsistencies and zombie divesites > that are created but have no user. We would need a kill command :) > A solid logbook file should have only divesites for real dives. > > We could argue that when I remove all dives for a divesite I could > decide to leave the zombie divesite for future use. But IMHO we are > looking for troubles. > > > Really thank yo for your huge work. > So, to summarize: - Only add / remove / remove dive sites from the Dive Site Management View - on Notes: only Select the dive site for the current dive ( and an edit button ) That?
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
