On 25 March 2015 at 13:59, Claudiu Olteanu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there, > > After I did a research about the Qt Bluetooth API, I updated the > implementation > section with a second approach which implies the Qt module. Please take a look > over the Implementation and Plan sections and tell me if you believe that they > should be improved [1]. >
thanks for the research, i'm very surprised that Windows is one of the platforms that Qt Bluetooth doesn't support yet. it's certainly a primary platform for us (and perhaps for them). i would go with Qt's Bluetooth for all other platforms and write a local MS Bluetooth stack interface, instead of adding another dependency. then at some point when Qt's Bluetooth supports Windows, this local interface can be removed. 2c > In the remained time I will try to create a diagram block as Lubomir > suggested. > you can skip this part and spend the time in more research if you'd prefer! lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
